Event Tickets My Account Advertise About Us Contact Us Archive RSS Newsletters

Who Stole the Ruby Slippers?

Suspicious Munchkins, Hollywood hucksters, and lunatic fans (oh, my): Inside the very weird and not so wonderful search for an American icon

Who Stole the Ruby Slippers?
Photo by Todd Buchanan

(page 3 of 3)


Yet the local yokel theory feels so anticlimactic, so dull, that when Bennett says, “It’s a shame—there’s obviously thousands of fans out there; they deserve better than to have some punk kid throw ’em in the river,” one imagines he could be condemning the lack of drama as much as the theft. Where’s a flying monkey when you want one?

There is another theory, say the fans, one that offers a level of intrigue that the situation would seem to require. But it implicates someone who presumably wasn’t in the market for a pair of ruby slippers: Michael Shaw.

When something as valuable as the slippers disappears without a trace, “the first thing you think of is insurance fraud,” says Bennett, who admits that Shaw’s behavior during the investigation has been “eccentric.” Shortly after the theft, Shaw called the investigator and demanded that he check in with him every day until he found the shoes. When, after some time, Bennett didn’t bother, Shaw phoned him. “I thought I told you to call me!” he yelled. At the Los Angeles press conference, too, Shaw seemed to protest too much. He revealed that he had insured the shoes for $1 million. But then exclaimed: “But I don’t want the money! I want the shoes!”

It hasn’t helped that Shaw has a penchant for exaggeration, one that—in most circumstances—would seem harmless if curious. When I first met him in 2004, he arrived for our interview in a threadbare Oz T-shirt and a faux-leather jacket imprinted with the logo of the old Knight Rider television show. He often claims to have been the voice of the show’s KITT car. In fact, he was the voice of KITT, not on the show, but on the Universal Studios tour.

Over the years, experts on the ruby slippers also cast doubt on Shaw’s moving tale of taking the slippers to his dying friend’s bedside. The friend was, of course, Kent Warner, and by all accounts, he remained furious with Shaw right up to his death—because he’d intended for the slippers to go to Debbie Reynolds. “If Michael Shaw was actually at his deathbed with the shoes,” says one insider, “well, then I’m a flying monkey.”

Before the slippers were stolen, Shaw admitted that he’d grown tired of the scrutiny of fans and historians. “In recent years I’ve been so angry,” he told me back in 2004, “because they’ve made those of us who were the earlier collectors sound like we worked for the Mafia. This is something that’s infuriating.” People needed to understand, he said, how different things were 40 years ago when Warner was making daily trips to the MGM warehouse, walking in with empty duffel bags and leaving with full ones. He’d received a wink and a nod from the guards—and nothing more. “I used to avoid telling people how I got [the ruby slippers],” he told me, “because, first of all, it’s a pretty dull story. I tell people, ‘What difference does it make how I got them? I got them for you to see.’”

Some fans now question Shaw’s motives. Steve Jarrett, who runs the Ruby Slipper Fan Club, publicized the website that Shaw authorized to presumably solicit tips. But Jarrett became disillusioned when the site morphed into a store peddling T-shirts and bracelets asking, “Who stole the ruby slippers?”

About a year after the theft, Shaw reached a settlement with his insurance agency, a figure not publicly disclosed by mutual agreement between Shaw and the company. Shaw says that he had the shoes appraised at a minimum of $1.5 million—and that he received much more than the $666,000 figure most observers have assumed, the amount last paid for a pair of slippers at auction. A private investigator hired by the insurance agency apparently found no reason not to pay.

By the time of the settlement, however, some fans wondered if Shaw had lost interest in reaching out to them—and in recovering the shoes. His phone calls to Bennett had ceased. He had stopped making the rounds of Oz festivals. His website closed down altogether. As for the Judy Garland Museum, his stamping grounds for so many years, Shaw ended the relationship right after learning of the theft. “We haven’t spoken,” says director Kelsch with a shrug. “He got his money.”

Upon returning from Grand Rapids this summer, I phone Shaw at his home. When I explain why I’m calling, he seems taken aback. “Are you kidding me?” he says coolly. There’s a long pause.

In the world of celebrity memorabilia, the failure to recover the ruby slippers has conjured no little trepidation—a fear that people aren’t taking the icon’s disappearance seriously. Fear that the magic is finally wearing off. If the slippers lose their hold on the American imagination, what other cultural mementos might we deem disposable? “It’s an American national treasure that’s been stolen and no one gives a damn!” cries Brian Cummings, a New York appraiser of celebrity memorabilia. “It blows my mind to know that they’re still out there.”

Yet in their new status as stolen property, the slippers feel more real than they have in years. They are mere objects again, to be lost or found, and perhaps this is for the best. The old movie studios, we know now, were never in the business of making magic so much as illusions. Stars like Garland were fed pills and cigarettes by their studio bosses (and stage moms) to control their weight. They were products, as manufactured as the props, from their stage names to their public lives, created for them by studio publicity departments. To treasure Hollywood memorabilia is to value fantasy over this harsh reality, to ignore the man behind the curtain.

In his later years, Kent Warner seemed to recognize the ruby slippers for what they were. By the time he died in 1984, he had long since sold the pumps he’d taken for himself. “He realized they were consuming all the attention of his friends—more than he was,” says Thomas, the book author. “He really began then to understand their power. What people invest in them is the enduring power of belief. They are magic shoes because we believe they are magic shoes.”

Shaw, on the other hand, seemed to have remained enamored. “I believe he invested his heart and soul in those shoes,” says Thomas. Shaw had told him, “If I never owned another possession, I’d be happy.” If Shaw was reluctant to explain how he acquired the shoes, it seemed partly because this might spoil the illusion of their magic. “Why chop off the Easter Bunny’s ears?” Shaw asked Thomas when the journalist began asking questions.

Now 72, Shaw sounds weary of magic, disillusioned. He says that the loss has devastated him, not least because of the fans’ reaction. “It was like having a piece of my gut yanked out of me. I’m the one who was violated. I was the only collector who allowed my ruby slippers to be used for festivals and museums and charities.” Among the fans, he says, were “jerks” who had it in for him, “who were rather pleased that they were stolen…I generously made the slippers available for these people and this is the way my generosity is repaid!”

Shaw then tells me that just before the slippers were stolen he had made up his mind to cease their travels. One way or another, they would have disappeared.

The diminishing fan base, Shaw says, had been getting him down—“I was seeing the same people state after state.” Soon, it seemed, only the delusional would be left, seeking refuge in Oz, missing the real point of the slippers: To go home to reality, away from dangerous fantasylands. Shaw says he just didn’t get out soon enough, that one of these fanatics is probably the thief. “He knows he can’t openly show them,” Shaw says, “but he’s got to have them. Right now he may well be putting them on, along with his size 11 gingham dress and fake braids.”

In three years, police haven’t been able to verify this or any other theory. The search has all but ended. Last year, the statute of limitations expired—the perpetrator of the theft, with few exceptions, can now only be prosecuted for possession. The police have largely moved on. The mystery is now worthy of Hollywood itself: They are the most coveted shoes in the world, and they could be anywhere.
 

Tim Gihring is senior writer and arts editor for Minnesota Monthly.


Comments may be edited for length, clarity, or appropriateness.

Old to new | New to old
Mar 9, 2009 09:23 pm
 Posted by  JudyGarland.com

My name is Michael Siewert and I suppose I am one of those weird, fanatical collectors that you speak of. I do, after all, own the worlds largest collection of Judy Garland memorabilia. Only thing is....I actually have a life. You have no idea what it costs to acquire and preserve such a collection. (Take a look at www.JudyGarland.com). If I were not a successful businessman I could certainly not afford the artifacts that I own, which include 15 iconic original costume gowns that Garland wore throughout her career. If I were as kooky as you would like your readers to think I am, I certainly would not have been as successful in life as I have been. Between the comparisons of some of the fans thinking my complete identity is proclaimed by my collection and your fantasy of me being some gay freak of nature, it is wonder how I could survive a single day. Collecting is a hobby like many others. Some people simply have the means to acquire more rare artifacts. As your article seems to uncover some sub culture of fantasy, the article, itself is just that. I feel that most of what you have reported has been taken out of context for the purpose to have an interesting story. As someone who knows so many of the details which you tried to convey, I was bored with your style. I was even one of the suspected collectors who had stolen the slippers. I spoke with both local and Federal agents to clear my name. More than anything I would like to clarify one thing. The Judy Garland Festival is still a popular event. Since the slippers were stolen, I have been a guest of the festival and have exhibited my rare collection every year since. Of course you failed to give that flattering and uplifting report. The fans have asked the director of the museum to ask me back every year. I would be curious to know what hobbies you might have and how that might be conceived by the public. Quite possibly I could write a story about what a strange man you are.
Michael SIewert, www.JudyGarland.com

Feb 23, 2010 09:41 pm
 Posted by  whocares

If I am to understand Tim Gihring correctly, Kent Warner stole items, including the shoes from MGM?

If so, why is nobody pointing out how illegal and shady that is?

This article also says Michael Shaw got his shoes by lying to Warner about them being for Miss Reynolds...also shady and dishonest, if true.

Why would anyone want to be associated with these guys if what is said in this article is accurate?

Liars, thieves, and crooks...oh my!

Jun 14, 2010 02:41 pm
 Posted by  JudyFan

I just returned from the Judy Garland Festival in Minnesota. I traveled from out of state for 3 days of pure Garland fun. Not sure why the writer feels the festival is getting smaller and people are losing interest because there were more people this year than the last time I attended five years ago. I think this guy needs to check his facts with actual attendance records.

For those of you out there have have an interest in Judy, the festival is very informative and the folks that attend are a lot of fun. Of course there are always a few odd balls in attendance but in my mind it only adds to the fun.

Jun 1, 2011 07:07 am
 Posted by  BlondeJohn

As an attendee of the "Wizard of Oz Festival" in Chesterton
Indiana, I see the wonder in the eyes of the children who love
the classic movie as much as me. I think we all have a soft spot for our past, and it is certainly wonderful to have some
good things in our lives... One of the all-time bestselling ornaments, in Hallmarks collection, are the Ruby Slippers...In fact, they have already designed and sold two styles of the glam pumps... As long as there is facination in the world, we
will always love Judy, her movies and the pumps that helped her along the way!
Blonde John in Holy Toledo

Aug 3, 2011 02:39 am
 Posted by  andypetes2011

Michael is outraged and I believe he has every right to be.

Like Michael, I am a huge fan of the Wizard of Oz and Judy Garland, and when I found out that one of the best pairs of Ruby Slippers worn by Judy Garland that we know of to exist were stolen, it broke my heart.

It seems to me that in light of when the slippers were stolen (the night of Hurricane Katrina) the case has not gotten the attention it deserves. I also think the media (as represented in this article) and the police department's failure to treat this issue seriously (making 'tongue-n-cheek' jokes and so forth) has also depleted momentum in the case immensely.

Why should it matter? Its just an old dusty pair of shoes. Yes, they maybe old and dusty. But they are a national treasure, a treasure that has become intricately engraved in our American fabric. They are more then just a "dusty pair of shoes," they are a symbol and a significant part of American History, and the American public deserves them back.

I think something needs to be done to put pressure on law officials to at least bring what happened to the slippers to light. I think the American public deserves that much.

Also, in response to the post made by "WHOCARES"- MGM and Warner Brothers were selling off everything they could on the studio lots in the 70s and NO ONE cared about these historical costumes. If it wasn't for the efforts of Michael Shaw, the ruby slippers might have never been recovered at all.

Sep 23, 2011 06:44 pm
 Posted by  balinwire

The auction in Culver City was quite a spectacle. I had no money for real bidding so I was able to but a cheap buckle for a two bucks. I remember there was so much stuff and almost a riot. I was most displeasured they sold off all the props but thats Hollywood, it always erases its past and reinvents itself. They really are only $20 thrift store shoes, all the thrift stores then had tons of 1930's Hollywood stuff, I bought a 30-100 Grand Gutiar for 3 bucks and sold it for $30. Long story. Who knew what this stuff would become. I still collect small shards of history and everyone thinks I am a hoarder. My Mom bailed out of South Dakota via Minnesota in 1948 and landed in old Hollywood where I was exposed to the ghosts of a bygone era.

Nov 17, 2011 09:21 pm
 Posted by  Laurabell

andypetes2011,

"Efforts" ?

Lets get to the facts here babe.

Warner STOLE the slippers and many other items and SOLD THEM out of the back of a car.

NOT his property to sell.

Shaw was asked by Debbie Reynolds to pick up a pair for her and Warner was under the impression he was selling them to Reynolds though Shaw.

Shaw LIED and kept them for himself.

No ifs, and , or buts abut it.

Jun 7, 2014 10:59 pm
 Posted by  f52b

Hmmm. Shaw probably has the slippers and they never made it to the museum. A phony pair were most likely displayed. How do you break Plexiglas? Jk turned off the alarm the evening before the theft. The door alarm was turned off by JK because people were using the door and the noise was annoying. Their were no working cameras and there was only one guard no where nearby at the time. JK's story of the theft told to me is as suspect as the theft itself.

Shaw was paid $800K by Essex insurance company. $250K award by Essex and $50K award by an anonymous donor.

I of course know nothing about this except for those who know everything about what I am saying. For the record, I am not accusing anyone except the true thief...

Add your comment:

Subscribe

Your Essential Guide to Dining, Shopping & Culture
  • Less than $1.67 an issue.
  • 66.7% off newsstand price.
  • The best Minnesota has to offer.

Your guide to the good life, delivered to your in-box.
MNMO E-Dition
MNMO Culture
MNMO Style
MNMO Dish
MNMO Weekend Best Bets
The M-List Partner events
MNMO Preferred Reader Club
MNMO Holiday Hotlist
MNMO Travel
GIVE 2014 Charitable
Email Address:

Once you submit your email, you will then select which e-newsletters you want.

We don’t like spam either, so we’ll keep your e-mail address to ourselves.